This is the history of Laguna homes
Laguna Beach is known for its beautiful homes. But preserving and expanding a home to make it livable for our residents can be met with shocking opposition from special interest groups.
Whether you know the Kirbys’ story or not, you know a dozen more just like it…
They’ve taken every step asked of them and gone above and beyond to preserve their historic dream home and make it livable for their family, and yet the Kirbys are being sued by “preservationist” groups who seem to only have their own interests at heart, not those of our community and residents.
The filers of the lawsuit know what they’re doing all too well. They’re using any legal action possible to bleed the project dry until the Kirbys run out of money or simply go away.
These people have no problem spending your tax dollars and holding up local preservation projects for years all in the name of stopping "development". Development? You've got to be kidding. The Kirbys aren't looking to build a strip mall; they're trying to preserve and make livable a historic home they love so that it doesn't fall apart until there's nothing left. That's not "development". That's real preservation by a family who really cares.
Unbelievable? You don’t know the half of it…
2017
May 2017 - The Kirbys bought the late 1920’s era home in North Laguna, next door to Mrs. Kirby’s childhood home. The home had 60 years of deferred maintenance, and at only 19’ across with stairs & a hallway through the middle and truly only one usable bedroom, the home had been bought and sold many times by families who ultimately found it unlivable. The Kirbys planned to restore the main house and add on bedrooms over the secondary rear section of the house for their children, a home office, and garage.
Aug 2017 - The Kirbys submitted initial plans to the City. Because it is listed on the City’s voluntary historic register, the City scheduled a site visit.
Oct 2017 - The City conducted a site visit and informed the Kirbys that the house would need to go through the historic review process, as expected.
2018
Aug 2018 - The Kirbys hired a historian to consult and advise on the project. The historian visited the house and created a report with recommendations. The Kirbys modified their plans to include as many of the historian’s recommendations as possible to minimize impact while still making it livable for their family.
2019
Jan 2019 - The Kirbys attended a meeting with the Heritage Committee, who approved their adjusted plans with very minor modifications, to which the Kirbys agreed.
Mar 2019 - Revised plans were submitted to the City.
May 2019 - The City returned with comments and requested minor changes, which directly addressed any potential issues with CEQA compliance.
Jul 2019 - The Kirbys submitted revised plans to the City, which were approved under guidance from the Senior Planner who holds a Master’s degree in Historic Preservation from the University of Pennsylvania. Plans were approved. The Kirby’s architect has vast experience with historic properties, having been recognized for his preservation skills while studying architecture at Arizona State University. He also served on the Heritage Committee for the City of Laguna Beach for several years and has been the architect for many preservation projects in Laguna Beach, including the historic Heisler Building on Coast Highway.
Sep 2019 - Staking poles went up at 369 Hawthorne Road.
Sep 2019 - Neighbor Dennis Sundman submitted letters to project architect Todd Skenderian and the City stating that the project will block his view down the back alley and claiming that the Kirbys have made no attempt to discuss the project with him, meanwhile directly quoting from a friendly email that Mrs. Kirby sent him the week prior.
Sep 2019 - Mrs. Kirby saw Dennis Sundman walking by the house and, as a follow up to the email she sent the prior week, asked him if he will discuss the project so they can work together on a solution. Sundman replied curtly, “It looks pretty serious,” and refused to speak further, walking away.
Nov 2019 - Architect Todd Skenderian received a call from Sundman’s attorney, advising of his representation of Dennis Sundman. Todd met with the lawyer and Dennis Sundman at the upper unit of the rear structure on Sundman’s property to see the view down the alley that the Kirby project would affect.
2020
Jan 2020 - Todd Skenderian started working on plans that significantly pull back the Kirbys 2nd-story structure that would affect Dennis Sundman's view down the alley from the upper unit of the rear structure on his property.
Jan 2020 - The Kirbys received a letter from a Santa Ana lawyer claiming to represent Dennis Sundman, demanding that the Kirbys and "all of your agents cease and desist from engaging any of the following conduct:
1) Speaking with my clients or their children
2) Dispatching any written communication to them, including but not limited to emails and/or faxes.
3) Contacting them in any manner."
March 2020 - Dennis Sundman sent a letter to City Planner Melinda Dacey accusing the City of "incompetence and/or corruption" in their handling of the project and stated that "these new bully owners from the start sought to destroy both the character of the house and neighborly relations, all with your concurrence."
March 2020 - The Kirbys finalized drawings to significantly pull back the 2nd-story structure (losing a room) and submitted them to the City, consistent with the discussions with Sundman.
June 2020 - The City approved the revised plans.
July 2020 - New staking poles went up at 369 Hawthorne to reflect the greatly reduced size of the addition, changed to accommodate the view from the Sundman property down the alley.
Aug/Sep 2020 - All Design Review Board members met with the Kirbys in person and toured the property. Some toured Dennis Sundman's property as well.
Sep 2020 - the Design Review Board approved the project 4 to 1.
Sep 2020 - Dennis Sundman filed an appeal of the Design Review Board’s ruling.
Nov 2020 - All City Council members met with the Kirbys in person and toured the property. Some toured Dennis Sundman's property as well.
Nov 2020 - Multiple letters accusing the City and Design Review Board of gross negligence, incompetence, agism and corruption were sent to the City Council by Dennis Sundman, Johanna Felder (Village Laguna President), Catherine Jurca and Francesca Smith (Glendale-based historic activists). Likewise, multiple letters were sent to the City by immediate neighbors on the Kirby’s block all in strong support of the project.
Dec 2020 - City Council meeting. A dozen neighbors who live within 300’ of the project called in and passionately supported the project. A couple of Village Laguna members and Catherine Jurca made a case against it. Dennis Sundman didn't speak at all. City Council approved the project 5-0.
2021
Jan 2021 – A Bay-area attorney and historic activist called the Kirbys’ lawyer and informed him that Dennis Sundman had joined the board of the Historic Architecture Alliance, which was formed for the express purpose of litigating against the Kirbys alongside The Laguna Beach Historic Preservation Coalition (we refer to these as “the Groups”). At the Kirby’s direction, their lawyer asked if these Groups had recommendations on what could be done to the Kirby house plans to avoid the litigation.
Feb 1, 2021 - The Groups’ lawyer returned with a plan that only included an addition of a very small one-story structure in the rear of the property, half of which would be a single-car garage, leaving the other half for a small bedroom for the Kirby's 5 and 7 year old children. The response also had other stipulations such the prohibition of building a playhouse for the Kirby children, paying all fees accrued by Dennis Sundman, etc. The Kirbys’ lawyer replied that the Kirbys would need some time to review their suggestions.
Feb 3, 2021 (two days later) - The Groups’ lawyer filed a lawsuit without further discussion of the Groups’ proposed redesign of the Kirby family home. This came as a surprise. The Kirbys’ lawyer offered that the Kirbys would consider abandoning their CEQA categorical exemption for a waiver of fees.
Feb 4, 2021 - The Groups rejected the Kirby offer, so the Kirbys’ lawyer requested the Group’s settlement demand. The Groups’ lawyer replied that she did not like the term "demand" but told the Kirbys’ lawyer that Sundman and the Groups had incurred well over $50,000 in "accrued actual attorney's fees and costs".
Aug 31, 2021 - A hearing date at the Superior Court of Orange County was set for February 4, 2022.
2022
Feb 2022 - The hearing date at the Superior Court of Orange County was moved from February 4, 2022 to April 22, 2022.
Apr 2022 - The hearing date was moved from April 22, 2022 to May 20, 2022.
May 20, 2022 - Superior Court Judge Randall J. Sherman ruled that the City of Laguna Beach acted properly in its review and approval of the Kirby’s plans to renovate their historic home in North Laguna.
Aug 9, 2022 - The Groups’ lawyer filed an appeal of Judge Sherman’s ruling.
2023
Jan 2023 – The Groups’ lawyer filed their opening brief to the State of California’s Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three. The City of Laguna Beach and Kirby Family filed their Joint Respondents’ Brief shortly after.
May 9, 2023 - The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate, District Division 3 set the date of June 20, 2023 at 1:30pm to hear oral arguments in the appeal.
Sep 9, 2023 - The California Court of Appeal affirmed the original judgement from over a year prior, confirming that the City of Laguna Beach acted properly in its review and approval of the Kirby’s house plans.
Sep 18, 2023 - The opposing Groups’ filed a Petition for Rehearing.
Late Sep 2023 - Multiple parties requested that the Court of Appeal officially publish the opinion that the City of Laguna Beach acted properly.
Oct 6, 2023 - The Court of Appeal published the opinion in the Official Report and denied the opposing Groups’ petition for rehearing.
Nov 14, 2023 - The opposing Groups submitted a Petition for Review and a Request for Depublication to the state Supreme Court.
2024
Jan 10 2024 - The state Supreme Court denied the opposition’s Petition for Review and Request for Depublication. Case closed. Justice prevails.